home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT2673>
- <title>
- Dec. 02, 1991: A Brassy New Golden Oldie
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Dec. 02, 1991 Pearl Harbor:Day of Infamy
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- CINEMA, Page 86
- A Brassy New Golden Oldie
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By RICHARD SCHICKEL
- </p>
- <qt>
- <l>FOR THE BOYS</l>
- <l>Directed by Mark Rydell </l>
- <l>Screenplay by Marshall Brickman, Neal Jimenez and Lindy Laub</l>
- </qt>
- <p> She's all bubble, bounce and ribald badinage. And, boy,
- can she belt a song, especially ones from the age when people
- wrote songs for stars to belt. It's tempting to call Bette
- Midler a force of nature--except there is nothing natural
- about what she does. She's a living, breathing high concept, a
- bundle of nerve and other people's conventions (a little Mae
- West, a touch of Judy Garland, maybe all three Andrews Sisters
- rolled into one). But if as a performer Midler conjures up an
- older, bolder show-biz era, she doesn't nostalgize it. She gives
- it a rude, shrewd yet affectionate twist, satirizing and
- energizing it for contemporary audiences.
- </p>
- <p> You don't cast a creation like Midler--you package her.
- Or allow her to package herself, as she has in For the Boys,
- which her company produced. Not surprisingly, Boys comes out a
- lot like one of her songs, a slightly dislocating blend of
- warmth and knowingness.
- </p>
- <p> The film, no less a golden oldie than most of those tunes,
- is reminiscent of the kind of '40s and '50s musicals that
- recounted the entire professional histories of show folk but
- left plenty of room for production numbers. At its best, it
- simultaneously evokes, subverts and transcends those sentimental
- and celebratory pictures.
- </p>
- <p> The film traces the intertwining of an act from the first
- meeting of singer-funny girl Dixie Leonard (Midler) and
- song-and-dance man Eddie Sparks (James Caan) at a USO show in
- wartime England to the final tribute to them as national
- treasures. That treasurability derives from a willingness to
- perform for U.S. troops wherever and whenever they are
- embattled, and from the public's belief that despite the
- couple's bickering, they really love each other.
- </p>
- <p> Maybe so, in their way. But how come they never married,
- and slept together only once? Well, partly because she can't
- help topping him onstage or in moral debate. It's hard to
- cuddle up to all that brass. But also because he's tricky goods,
- with one of those smeary little mustaches that signal
- untrustworthiness and the kind of stage manner from which
- unexamined overuse has drained both spontaneity and
- authenticity. Even Eddie's devotion to the USO circuit is
- suspect. His piety is a bit too hair-trigger, and there's always
- a self-serving glint in his eye when he volunteers the duo for
- hazardous duty. It's a way for an unlovable man to get love.
- </p>
- <p> Both performers are brave in their willingness to dig into
- familiar show-biz types and critically, if often hilariously,
- deconstruct their belovedness. They are also resourceful in the
- ways they find to retain our affection. Good writing, in which
- strong satire never breaks faith with emotional reality, helps
- them. So do the easy stride of Mark Rydell's direction, covering
- a variety of ground without shortness of breath, and a lively
- supporting cast.
- </p>
- <p> But the crucial decision was to give the film an epic
- scale. It encompasses 50 years, four continents and three wars,
- not to mention the rise of TV, the ugliness of McCarthyism and
- the horror of Vietnam. That spaciousness relieves the
- claustrophobia that sometimes builds up after prolonged exposure
- to larger-than-life figures (a particular danger when Midler is
- bent on proving herself as a dramatic actress). For the Boys is
- an ambitious film, but it wears its ambitions lightly and
- lovably.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-